| Paradigm Concepts http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/ |
|
| Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/viewtopic.php?f=69&t=2559 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Eric Hughes [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
So, can I take a Sorcery Rune as a Warlock and have cast Animate Dead into the rune from a scroll. Then use the my Warlock spell slots to fuel the Sorcery Rune to allow me to cast Animate Dead as a Warlock, even though Animate Dead is not on the Warlock spell list? The problem I am trying to overcome is how best to recreate a raised Oozejumper in 5e. Before his untimely death at the hands of mighty Yarris, he was a primal caster with Necromancy as his primary casting ability. I can best get that "feel" from Warlock. But Warlock does not have animate dead on its spell list. Alternatively I could go Wizard, and get Animate Dead that way. But then I lose some of the Creepy Shamanistic "Feel". I am also open to ideas to make a Wizard "Feel" more Shamanistic in outlook. |
|
| Author: | Southernskies [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
Doing some quick research, it appears that Warlock alone isn't going to work. Using a Spell Scroll, the spell still needs to appear on your class list (DMG pg200 + updated SRD), so you will need to multi-class into at least 1 level of Wizard (and then make an INT check at DC13 to use the scroll). After that, the Sorcery Rune (Rare) works as written and the concept will work. |
|
| Author: | toodeep [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
Or, considering that the 5e book for Arcanis has yet to be written, you could try to pull together a suggestion for a specific patron for a warlock/shaman that provides necromancy and feels true to the type of things shamans do in Arcanis, then stat out suggested/potential advancement powers and show how it works then submit it to Paradigm Concepts for their review. That's still an option isn't it? |
|
| Author: | Eric Hughes [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
Who says _I_ have to case the Animate Dead spell into the rune? |
|
| Author: | Southernskies [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
The rules for the rune do. |
|
| Author: | Eric Hughes [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
Gota ya. Sorcery Rune will not work. But what about a spell rune? Can I expend a spell slot and recharge the spell rune even though the spell contained within it isn't on my spell list? |
|
| Author: | Auroris [ Sun May 07, 2017 9:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
Eric Hughes wrote: Gota ya. Sorcery Rune will not work. But what about a spell rune? Can I expend a spell slot and recharge the spell rune even though the spell contained within it isn't on my spell list? The sorcery rune won't work for what you want to do but a spell rune will. You can expend one of your precious warlock spell slots to recharge the spell rune as explained in the rune's effects. |
|
| Author: | PCI_StatMonkey [ Thu May 11, 2017 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sorcery Runes and spells not on spell list |
toodeep wrote: Or, considering that the 5e book for Arcanis has yet to be written, you could try to pull together a suggestion for a specific patron for a warlock/shaman that provides necromancy and feels true to the type of things shamans do in Arcanis, then stat out suggested/potential advancement powers and show how it works then submit it to Paradigm Concepts for their review. That's still an option isn't it? You may want to wait for the Undir Shaman archtype.. just saying |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|