Last visit was: It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:22 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:46 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:31 pm
Posts: 69
Location: U.S.A. Ohio
Dark-kin can and Ss'erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?

_________________
Ryan Ramsey
Lo Gorie- Dark-Kin Barbarian 1 & Fighter 3. FL: Legio Anguis Reptatus.
Savic No Taste- Ghost Scale 1.4 Expert, Exile, Assassin Initiate, Weirdo.


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:50 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 297
RexSplode wrote:
Dark-kin can and Ss'erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?


By the standard 5e rules, they stack. Not sure if any changes might come for Arcanis 5e regarding this matter.

_________________
Talendos, the Shadow Raven
3.0 Expert, Soldier of Retribution, Assassin
"When you do something right, it's as if you didn't do it at all ..."

Echo
B-lister, Super Human, Brawler
"Bringing the noise!"


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:52 am 

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:31 pm
Posts: 69
Location: U.S.A. Ohio
EddieS wrote:
RexSplode wrote:
Dark-kin can and Ss'erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?


By the standard 5e rules, they stack. Not sure if any changes might come for Arcanis 5e regarding this matter.


So.. because one is a racial natural armor bonus and feature, it doesn't conflict with the unarmored defense class feature? Thats what i'm getting when i read them. I'm just confirming.

Edit:

They do not stack. http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/feature ... nuary-2016

_________________
Ryan Ramsey
Lo Gorie- Dark-Kin Barbarian 1 & Fighter 3. FL: Legio Anguis Reptatus.
Savic No Taste- Ghost Scale 1.4 Expert, Exile, Assassin Initiate, Weirdo.


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:50 am 

Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 297
RexSplode wrote:


Interesting, this change was made at the beginning of the year as previously this wasn't the case. Glad you brought this up and serves me as a reminder to check the rulings more often than once a year :lol:

It should be noted though that a Dark-kin's bestial hide isn't Natural Armor (as per the definition of the 5e D&D rules, though it does appear to fit more inline with the Sorcerer's Draconic Resilience).

Hmm, I wonder if this means the Arcanis gawdz that be will re-take a look at Dark-kin's Bestial Hide or keep it as concurrent to the 5e ruling you just linked.

_________________
Talendos, the Shadow Raven
3.0 Expert, Soldier of Retribution, Assassin
"When you do something right, it's as if you didn't do it at all ..."

Echo
B-lister, Super Human, Brawler
"Bringing the noise!"


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:14 am 

Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:46 am
Posts: 85
When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer's feature.


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:55 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:31 pm
Posts: 69
Location: U.S.A. Ohio
EddieS wrote:

Interesting, this change was made at the beginning of the year as previously this wasn't the case. Glad you brought this up and serves me as a reminder to check the rulings more often than once a year :lol:

It should be noted though that a Dark-kin's bestial hide isn't Natural Armor (as per the definition of the 5e D&D rules, though it does appear to fit more inline with the Sorcerer's Draconic Resilience).

Hmm, I wonder if this means the Arcanis gawdz that be will re-take a look at Dark-kin's Bestial Hide or keep it as concurrent to the 5e ruling you just linked.


If I had to guess, this rule clarification is meant to reduce the no armor wearing, high AC crowd. I mean just as a first level black talon monk in 5th ed, with the racial natural armor, an dex of 16 and a wis of 14, my AC would be 18! 18 is platemail level of defense. So going off the armor in the players handbook 16-18 is very decent AC.

Which is why I was skeptical if they stacked, it seemed to good to be true, and it was. :(

FGJustice wrote:
When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer's feature.


Hm. Are you saying, you think they will change the racial natural armor benefits for Arcanis 5th edition because of this rules change? Or just commenting on its original intention?

_________________
Ryan Ramsey
Lo Gorie- Dark-Kin Barbarian 1 & Fighter 3. FL: Legio Anguis Reptatus.
Savic No Taste- Ghost Scale 1.4 Expert, Exile, Assassin Initiate, Weirdo.


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 991
Compliance with 'core rules' as much as possible should occur with the campaign book.

I would think a rules sidebar in the campaign book saying "Bestial Hide follows all the rules for the Sorcerer's Draconic Resilience to reflect the infernal source of the ability" may appear.

_________________
LARG; Astra Tonsoria Ursula val¤Dellanov, Martial Former Tribune, Centurion Sword Sage II, T3.4
LA:5E; Magdelene of Ostermann, Dark-kin Courtesan Rog3(Bard)/HC2 (future twilight warrior)
LRC:OP; Seraphina "Flowerchild" Amakiir, Skill Hero


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:30 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 297
RexSplode wrote:
If I had to guess, this rule clarification is meant to reduce the no armor wearing, high AC crowd. I mean just as a first level black talon monk in 5th ed, with the racial natural armor, an dex of 16 and a wis of 14, my AC would be 18! 18 is platemail level of defense. So going off the armor in the players handbook 16-18 is very decent AC.

Which is why I was skeptical if they stacked, it seemed to good to be true, and it was. :(


I hear ya. Prior reading this ruling, my Dark-kin Barb was running around with AC 19 (Bestial Hide, 14 Dex, 16 Con, +Shield). Now, he'll be a 17 w/shield. Not too shabby for someone wearing no armor at lv. 1.

That being said, Dex based Ss'ressen are still pretty BOSS *nods*

_________________
Talendos, the Shadow Raven
3.0 Expert, Soldier of Retribution, Assassin
"When you do something right, it's as if you didn't do it at all ..."

Echo
B-lister, Super Human, Brawler
"Bringing the noise!"


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:08 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 103
Both the dark-kin and ss'ressen racial features are modeled after the Draconic Resilience class feature so they work that way. They don't stack with any other forms of armor but do work with shields. When the full 5e Arcanis book is released, these class features may be revised but currently that is how they work.

_________________
James Vacca, Living Arcanis Campaign Coordinator

Kailandos, Keeper of the Word and Soldier of Retribution


Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural armor and unarmored defense class features
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:52 am 

Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:46 am
Posts: 85
RexSplode wrote:
FGJustice wrote:
When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer's feature.


Hm. Are you saying, you think they will change the racial natural armor benefits for Arcanis 5th edition because of this rules change? Or just commenting on its original intention?


Commenting on the original intention. I wrote Bestial Hide to reflect the wording of Draconic Resilience, because with 5e math you can't have race adding to AC; it throws everything off and makes that race too powerful.


Top
Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Moderators: james.zwiers, PCI Eric, PCI_StatMonkey Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created StylerBB.net & kodeki