| Paradigm Concepts http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/ |
|
| rulings , informal agreement http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=661 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | SamhainIA [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | rulings , informal agreement |
So I'm going to start a movement to get some rules written down and consistent amongst judges Josh Opinions 0.1 So I can imagine a couple kinds of responses: 1 I dont like how X rules is addressed. My response to that, look at the threads on the subject, I've tried to take the majority opinions, if you dont like that, revive the thread if you think I didnt take the majority opinion, I'd prefer if you sent me a PM and a link with the argument. I dont think I'm going to respond to those arguments in this thread. 2 you forgot X rule, or your wrong Post a link to the thread or if one doesnt exsist start one! or send it to me in a PM with a link I will happily correct my document 3 I dont like this Idea, Josh How could you you know if you dont agree with all the rulings, Sorry its not just me your disagreeing with im just making myself a target, because i think people are frustrated at the variation of rulings. But its not offical its kinda a gentlemans agreement |
|
| Author: | wilcoxon [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
The link claims I need permissions to see it. |
|
| Author: | SamhainIA [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
fixed |
|
| Author: | wilcoxon [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
It looks good. The only thing I'd add (that I can think of right now anyway) is under shields note that Martial characters also only get Armor Proficiency Shield with national shields (and not all shields (so is different from the talent)) since a few people (including me) misinterpreted this. |
|
| Author: | Harliquinn [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
Looks like a nice list... Some things I found... 1) Undisciplined Scion: Since you're listing talents, I'd include Rudimentary Prayers or Spellcasting, just to cover all kinds of spellcasting. 2) Starting Languages: I don't think we've had enough consensus on this to make a 'informal agreement' on this. This really needs an official answer. 3) Weapon Training for Martial: I reviewed the thread, but I don't recall where this was stated. So does that mean they get both Shield and Weapon Training in their shields. Does that mean that Experts can choose Shield Training with their National / Any Weapon Choice? John |
|
| Author: | SamhainIA [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
wilcoxcon: it was already in there but i moved things around to be more clear John B see response #1 |
|
| Author: | archangel [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
The Enemy of my Enemy one has another copy of the Challenge ruling instead of its own. |
|
| Author: | SamhainIA [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
archangel can you pm a link ow hat your trying to point out? |
|
| Author: | wilcoxon [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
SamhainIA wrote: archangel can you pm a link ow hat your trying to point out? In your document, the Enemy of my Enemy ruling/agreement is a copy-paste of the Challenge entry (when it should be its own ruling). |
|
| Author: | SamhainIA [ Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: rulings , informal agreement |
Fixed them both, note challenge is adapting the same ruling |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|