Paradigm Concepts http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/ |
|
Ss'ressen scale question http://forums.paradigmconcepts.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=427 |
Page 4 of 4 |
Author: | Harliquinn [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
The Elemental Runes would probably 'take over' if one of the other AR's were bypassed. So if you had a rune that provided AR 2 Fire against attacks, but a fire attack bypassed your worn AR and / or natural AR, then the elemental rune should still absorb 2 points. John |
Author: | Deviknyte [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
Harliquinn wrote: The Elemental Runes would probably 'take over' if one of ta other AR's were bypassed. So if you had a rune that provided AR 2 Fire against attacks, but a fire attack bypassed your worn AR and / or natural AR, then the elemental rune should still absorb 2 points. John If the fire damage bypasses AR, why wouldn't it bypass Fire AR? Does the fire AR say it protects from bypass effects? |
Author: | Deviknyte [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
johnysilverado wrote: So, if the unassailable rune doesn't stack with the Nat AR+Worn AR of a ss'ressen in ss'ressen scale, then does that mean the elemental runes(fire, cold, etc) don't stack? Correct. The fire AR is attached to the armor and wouldn't stack. |
Author: | SamhainIA [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
Devin homework for you then find an elemental spell that bypasses all armor instead of "worn armor" I don't think you will find one |
Author: | Harliquinn [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
deviknyte wrote: Harliquinn wrote: The Elemental Runes would probably 'take over' if one of ta other AR's were bypassed. So if you had a rune that provided AR 2 Fire against attacks, but a fire attack bypassed your worn AR and / or natural AR, then the elemental rune should still absorb 2 points. John If the fire damage bypasses AR, why wouldn't it bypass Fire AR? Does the fire AR say it protects from bypass effects? Logical Answer: It's Magic and that's the purpose of elemental runes to protect against the elements. Official Answer: The rules state this under the elemental runes worn on Armor and Shields. "In addition, Runes bonus applies against <element> spells that would ignore the target's AR" John |
Author: | Deviknyte [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
Harliquinn wrote: deviknyte wrote: Harliquinn wrote: The Elemental Runes would probably 'take over' if one of ta other AR's were bypassed. So if you had a rune that provided AR 2 Fire against attacks, but a fire attack bypassed your worn AR and / or natural AR, then the elemental rune should still absorb 2 points. John If the fire damage bypasses AR, why wouldn't it bypass Fire AR? Does the fire AR say it protects from bypass effects? Logical Answer: It's Magic and that's the purpose of elemental runes to protect against the elements. Official Answer: The rules state this under the elemental runes worn on Armor and Shields. "In addition, Runes bonus applies against <element> spells that would ignore the target's AR" John Didn't have my book. @ work. So yeah, applies vs bypass. |
Author: | Harliquinn [ Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
I think part of the confusion is the unfortunate side effect of naming everything AR. The elemental is really more of a DR (Damage Reduction) from a specific source. John |
Author: | PCI_StatMonkey [ Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ss'ressen scale question |
Correct they do not stack.. but they DO save you from spells of that element which bypass worn armor also if your base AR is lower.. and you get attacked by the element for which your rune is attuned.. the higher value kicks in |
Page 4 of 4 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |